All Categories : Technical White Papers : CAE and FEA Bookmark and Share

Title : Finite Element Prediction of Progressively Formed Conical Stockpiles
Company : SIMULIA
File Name : fe-prediction-progressively-formed-conical-stockp-2009.pdf
Size : 24417
Type : application/pdf
Date : 09-Jul-2011

Rate This File
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star

Conical piles of granular solids can be found in many industrial sites. These piles are usually progressively formed by depositing from above. A classic question concerning such simple piles is the observation that the pressure distribution beneath the pile shows a marked local minimum beneath the apex which is counter-intuitive as this should be the location expected to have the maximum pressure. Numerous experimental, analytical and computational studies have been conducted to investigate this classical problem over the last few decades, but a comprehensive understanding of the problem remains elusive. A number of recent finite element simulations of the pile have considered the effects of construction history, plasticity and stressdependence of modulus of the granular solids. Whilst a pressure dip beneath the apex has been predicted, significant uncertainties remain about the effects of these factors on the pressure dip and their interaction. This paper presents the finite element modelling of a conical stockpile using Abaqus. The effect of construction history was realized by simulating the progressive formation of the conical pile. This was achieved by discretising the final geometry of the stockpile into multiple conical layers and then activating each layer sequentially. The effects of the elastic and plastic parameters were explored. The results show that a pressure dip may or may not be predicted depending on the constitutive model and the values for the model parameters. The study also shows that modelling the conical pile in one single step does not produce the pressure dip. It further shows that the central pressure dip is predicted using a relatively small number of layers and the magnitude of the dip is not sensitive to increasing number of layers, which is in contrast with one previous study.
User Reviews More Reviews Review This File
SolidCAM - Learn More

Featured Video
Editorial
Jobs
QA Engineer- F-35 Quality Engineering for Lockheed Martin at Forth Worth, Texas
Modeling and Simulation / HWIL Engineer for Lockheed Martin at Orlando, Florida
Geographic Information System Specialist for U. S. Dept. of the Interior at Washington, District Of Columbia
Structural Engineer for Harris County Houston Tx at Houston, Texas
Senior Operations Environmental Analyst for EDP renewables at Houston, Texas
Structural Engineering Lead for K2M Design at Cleveland, Ohio
Upcoming Events
EMO Hannover 2019 at Hannover Germany - Sep 16 - 21, 2019
WESTEC 2019 at Long Beach Convention & Entertainment Center 300 East Ocean Boulevard Long Beach CA - Sep 24 - 26, 2019
Engineer 3D! at Potawatomi Hotel and Casino 1721 W Canal St, Milwaukee, WI 53233 Milwaukee, WI WI - Oct 2 - 3, 2019
3D Collaboration & Interoperability Congress - 2019 at American Mountaineering Center Golden CO - Oct 8 - 10, 2019
Kenesto: 30 day trial
MasterCAM



Internet Business Systems © 2019 Internet Business Systems, Inc.
25 North 14th Steet, Suite 710, San Jose, CA 95112
+1 (408) 882-6554 — Contact Us, or visit our other sites:
AECCafe - Architectural Design and Engineering EDACafe - Electronic Design Automation GISCafe - Geographical Information Services TechJobsCafe - Technical Jobs and Resumes ShareCG - Share Computer Graphic (CG) Animation, 3D Art and 3D Models
  Privacy PolicyAdvertise