[ Back ]   [ More News ]   [ Home ]
May 12, 2003
Commentary: MCAD Industry View - Is the Turnaround Near?
Please note that contributed articles, blog entries, and comments posted on MCADcafe.com are the views and opinion of the author and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of the management and staff of Internet Business Systems and its subsidiary web-sites.
Russ Henke - Contributing Editor


by Russ Henke - Contributing Editor
Each MCAD Weekly Review delivers to its readers news concerning the latest developments in the MCAD industry, MCAD product and company news, featured downloads, customer wins, and coming events, along with a selection of other articles that we feel you might find interesting. Brought to you by MCADCafe.com. If we miss a story or subject that you feel deserves to be included, or you just want to suggest a future topic, please contact us! Questions? Feedback? Click here. Thank you!

Is there a high tech turnaround ahead? In particular, what does the landscape look like for the MCAD sector? One industry observer offers his thoughts on the subject

In the overall high tech sector, what do the broad Q1 2003 financial results tell us about the status of the three-year technology slide that began with the March 2000 NASDAQ meltdown? Despite the current ~9 percent unemployment rate in places like Silicon Valley, there are some fresh business statistics from Q1 2003 that provide optimists with hope for an eventual high tech turnaround. US Government Commerce Department figures show a Q1 2003 up-tick of 15 percent in business purchases of computers and software. Earnings for 60 tech companies in the S&P 500 Index are up 16% in Q1 2003 vs. Q1 2002, according to Thomson First Call.

However, gloom still grips many high tech companies. The gains mentioned above are from just a few companies, analysts speculate. Modest improvements here and there still leave the vast majority of high tech companies in the doldrums, because the protracted market slide has been so severe.

Indeed, Oracle Corp. Chairman & CEO Larry Ellison has been quoted as saying that the software industry will never again be as strong as it was in the late 90's. Others are more sanguine, since software spending is almost half of every dollar spent on technology these days. Most observers believe, however, that a high tech recovery will follow any general economic recovery, which probably means (notwithstanding promised "stimulus packages" from the White House) that the real high tech rebound and more high tech jobs are 12 to 24 months away.

Is the picture in the MCAD portion of high tech any better?

To gain a better understanding of what this means for the MCAD sector, let's take a closer look at some of the top players in this category. MCADcafe.com currently tracks the financial performance of eight (8) public companies in the Mechanical CAD market. Four of these companies (Autodesk, Dassault Systemes, PTC and EDS PLM Solutions) represent approximately 85 percent of the total revenue in this grouping, and each of these four companies offers a wide array of software and services products across the entire design to manufacturing space.

The remaining four public companies (ANSYS, Moldflow, MSC.Software and Tecnomatix) offer specialized software/services products in specific MCAD niches and together they create the remaining 15 percent of the total group-of-8's revenue. Indeed, these latter four companies frequently partner with the initial four to provide end- customers with broader solution suites.

The combined worldwide total annual revenue of these eight companies is nearly $4 billion, not an insignificant sum. But it is, in fact, less than 3 percent of the $150 billion spent annually on all types of software. So why study MCAD companies at all? The key to MCAD's importance lies in the leverage its users apply to create the everyday durable goods with which we are all familiar: automobiles, trucks, military gear & weapons, appliances, farm & construction equipment, aircraft & aerospace vehicles, etc. In short, MCAD is arguably responsible for enabling today's manufacturing industries, which are the centerpieces of creating real productivity and wealth in every modern economy.

Understanding the comparative MCAD revenue content of various vendors is not merely academic. For example, it helps observers better understand the likely future competitive MCAD strength of each vendor relative to its peers in such areas as amount of money available for R&D, for potential new acquisitions, for financial stability to weather economic cycles, and for other key business factors.

In comparing financial performances of the four largest MCAD companies tracked by MCADcafe.com, it's instructive to account for the actual MCAD content of each.

For example, the revenues of Dassault and PTC could arguably be considered 100% MCAD in nature, whereas Autodesk's total revenue is only partially made up from its business in MCAD. Some Autodesk revenue (~15%) stems from its Discreet segment, which provides systems and software for creating and animating imagery. Even in the remaining 85% of Autodesk's total revenue, derived from its Design Solutions Segment, is divided among solutions for Manufacturing, GIS, the building industry, and the platform technology group. Only the solutions of the Manufacturing Group, (Inventor, AutoCAD Mechanical, Mechanical Desktop, Streamline, Point A, etc.) might be thought of as "pure" MCAD revenue.

EDS' MCAD revenues are created by EDS PLM Solutions, the mid-2001 union of SDRC and UGS. While EDS PLM Solutions represents less than five percent of EDS' total revenues ($21.5 billion in 2002), EDS PLM Solutions annual revenues are right there at similar levels as the world's other MCAD revenue leaders Dassault and PTC.

For purposes of our discussion, we'll consider the revenues from the remaining four public companies (ANSYS, Moldflow, MSC.Software and Tecnomatix) to be 100% MCAD.


So how did the eight MCAD Companies do in calendar 2002?

In an industry striving for double-digit compounded annual growth rates (CAGR), clearly 2002 was not kind to most of these companies (see Figure 1). Indeed, anything better than "flat with 2001 revenues" might be viewed as a minor 2002 victory. MSC.Software was the only company with more than double-digit percent growth in 2002, driven primarily through it acquisitions, but the company's 2002 net income was way off from 2001.

As shown in Figure 1, only three of the eight companies improved their net income performances in 2002, with Dassault Systemes leading the pack with $142 million. Notably, ANSYS continued its steady multi-year growth of both revenues and net income, apparently unperturbed by the harsh economic times.

Company Total 2002
Revenue

($ million)
% of 2001 Total 2002
Net Income

($ millions)
Total 2001
Net Income

($ millions)

Autodesk 825 87%1 32 90
Dassault 869 104% 142 100
PTC 718 72% (99) (33)
EDS (total) 21502 102% 1116 1363
EDS PLM (est.) 935 *    
ANSYS 91 107% 19 14
Moldflow 35 101% 1 2
MSC.Software 344 146% (51) 10
Tecnomatix 82 94% (3) (14)

Figure 1 – Eight public MCAD Companies' Yearly Financial Performances2

1 The revenues for the Design Solutions Segment of Autodesk, which contains Manufacturing Solutions' MCAD revenue, increased 6% in 2002 vs. 2001.

2 For companies whose fiscal years did not end on December 31, 2002, the four quarters' results prior to the last reported quarter, were used here.

* EDS PLM was formed in mid-2001. Speculation is that total EDS PLM revenues in 2002 (~$935 million) are considerably less than the combined UGS/SDRC revenues would have been for all of 2001.


Price/Sales Ratio

Another key parameter that observers use to compare companies, is the ratio of market capitalization to ttm (trailing twelve month) revenues, which provides some insight into how the stock market values the "qualities" of the company and its financial performance.

How did the MCAD companies in our group-of-8 fare recently in this category (see Figure 2)?

Company Price/Sales Ratio
Autodesk 2.16
Dassault 3.98
PTC 1.19
EDS 0.43
EDS PLM NR
ANSYS 4.64
Moldflow 2.28
MSC.Software 0.51
Tecnomatix 0.91

Figure 2 – Eight public MCAD Companies' Yearly Price/Sales Ratios2

How about the most recent quarterly performances of our group-of-8?

Alas, for the four largest MCAD companies, their latest quarters' results revealed that their concerns are not yet over, if one compares the latest year-over-year quarterly results for revenue (see Figure 3). Quarterly revenue for the four is down year over year anywhere between five percent and twenty-three percent. On the other hand, the four smaller companies would appear to be either holding their own in their latest quarters (Moldflow & Tecnomatix) or even prospering (ANSYS & MSC.Software).

Relative to earnings per share (EPS), PTC revenues are still not overcoming costs, EDS (the parent of EDS PLM Solutions) has slipped into negative earnings territory, Moldflow also slipped into red ink territory, and Tecnomatix is not yet back in the black. Autodesk, Dassault Systemes and ANSYS are all in the black, and MSC.Software returned to black ink.

Company Last QTR
Revenue

($ millions)
Last QTR
EPS
Last QTR of
Previous Year
Revenue

($ millions)
Last QTR's % of
Previous Year's
Revenue

($ millions)

Autodesk 195 + 254 77%
Dassault 190 + 205 93%
PTC 171 -- 180 95%
EDS (5-7-03) 5370 -- 5265 102%
EDS PLM (5-7-03) 201 NR 227 87%
ANSYS 24.6 + 21.3 115%
Moldflow 9.5 -- 9.5 100%
MSC.Software 85.1 + 66.5 128%
Tecnomatix 20.6 -- 20.4 101%
Figure 3 – Eight public MCAD Companies' Latest Qtrly Financial Performances2 Company Forecasts

A further indication that the MCAD turnaround is not yet near can be gleaned from some of the comments paraphrased from recent company news releases as these companies contemplated their futures: Based on what has been documented in the foregoing paragraphs, it would be very difficult to assert that a major MCAD turnaround is "near". Of course, it all depends on what the definition of the word "near" is! It would definitely seem that "near" does not mean "during calendar 2003". All things being equal, and if a high tech rebound does follow a general economic recovery, "near" most likely means mid-2004 for an important MCAD recovery, at the soonest, before significant annual revenue growth rates start returning to MCAD public companies in general.

However, some MCAD companies may be poised to thrive sooner than others. So stay tuned. We'll be looking at these companies and more in the weeks and months ahead.

Comments? Feedback? Tell us what you think about this topic or if you have additional information you'd like to share on this subject! Submit your comments to: Email Contact.

About the Author
Since 1996, Dr. Russ Henke has served as president of HENKE ASSOCIATES, a San Francisco Bay Area high tech business & management consulting firm. During his corporate career, Henke has been on "both sides" of MCAD and EDA, as a user and as a vendor. He's a veteran corporate executive from Cincinnati Milacron, SDRC, Schlumberger, Gould Electronics, Mentor Graphics, and others. Further information on HENKE ASSOCIATES is available at http://www.henkeassociates.net.

Top Stories Product and Company News Special Notices Customer Wins [ more MCAD News]

Recommended Reading

(Note: $$ - denotes premium content. Article is available via a trial subscription or for a nominal fee.)

Bright future for automotive plastics
A luminescent polymer film that can be formed into almost any 3D shape could change the face of in-car lighting reports Jon Excell.

The Engineer, 01 May 2003


EDS announces Unigraphics NX 2
At the PLM World user group meeting, EDS announced the second release of Unigraphics NX, its high-function CAD/CAM system for automotive and aerospace applications. Here's a summary of what's new.

CADCAMNet, 01 May 2003 ($$)


The Addition of Subtraction
Milling is once again a valued rapid prototyping (RP) solution because of new subtractive rapid prototyping (SRP) technologies.

Time Compression Technologies, March/April 2003i [pdf]


[ more Recommended Reading]

Events

Rapid Prototyping and Manufacturing: Advanced Product Development Solutions Conference and Exposition, 12 - 15 May, 2003, Hyatt Regency, Chicago. Sponsored by the Society of Manufacturing Engineers (SME) at the Hyatt Regency in Chicago. For more information: phone: 800.733.4763; website: www.sme.org/rapid

HP Automotive CAE Symposium, 13 May 2003. Plymouth, MI

COFES2003: 4th Annual Congress on the Future of Engineering Software, 15-18 May 2003, Scottdale, AZ. The 4th Annual COFES event is set to bring you the latest and best information, understanding and clarity about the role engineering technology will play in your company's future survival and success.

NAFEMS World Congress 2003, 27-29 May 2003. Orlando, FL

ABAQUS Users' Conference 2003, 4-6 June 2003. Munich, Germany. Preliminary Announcement/Call for Papers

Daratech iDPS, 9-10 June 2003. Detroit, MI. Now in its third year, daratechiDPS AUTO2003 will focus on how today's digital prototyping and physical testing processes and tools are meeting auto makers' urgent requirements to shorten product development cycles, manage increasing model complexity and variety, and lower development costs. (Register by April 30th, and save $100!)

2003 International Forum on DFMA June 17-18, 2003. Newport, RI. Sponsored by Boothroyd Dewhurst, Inc. The International Forum on DFMA is the foremost conference worldwide on early design analysis methodologies and implementation. Conference papers will discuss specific product development programs and examine cost reductions and efficiency gains at some of the world.s leading manufacturing companies, such as Raytheon, Hewlett-Packard Company, Harley-Davidson Motor Company, and Visteon Corporation, among others.

CIMdata PLM Conference June 23-25, 2003. Detroit, MI. "Unleashing the Value of Your Intellectual Assets." At PLMconference2003, attendees will be provided with a total view of the PLM picture including an industry vision, available opportunities, strategies for solution selection and implementation, roadmaps to move forward, pitfalls to avoid, and direction to help maximize the value and benefits of their investment.

The Emerging Technologies Conference 2003 September 24-25, 2003. Kresge Auditorium, MIT Campus, Cambridge, MA. The Emerging Technologies Conference at MIT will focus on the technologies that are poised to make a dramatic impact on our world. Technology Review Magazine, the authority on emerging technology, will bring together world-renowned innovators and key leaders in technology and business. The 2-day conference will feature a mixture of keynote, panel and breakout discussions that will center on the transformative technological innovations that have the potential to fuel new economic growth.

[ more Events]

You can find the full MCADCafe event calendar here.

To read more news, click here.


-- Russ Henke, MCADCafe.com Contributing Editor.